Instructions to Reviewers

• Paper received for PJMTR undergo blind review process.
• Review process help in taking editorial decisions and in improvising the paper.
• Reviewer’s name shall be kept anonymous before sending the comments to authors.
• The author’s name are kept confidential and only chief editor and managing editor will be privy to it.
• A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the assigned manuscript should notify promptly to the chief editor.
• Any manuscript received by the reviewer should be kept highly confidential and should not be shared to others, except the chief editor.
• The review process should be conducted objectively and there should not be any personal criticism. The views expressed by the reviewer should have justification for their arguments.
• The review process should be conducted objectively and there should not be any personal criticism. The views expressed by the reviewer should have justification for their arguments.
• The reviewer should look out for sources of acknowledgment cited by the authors. In-case the reviewer finds substantially similar manuscript, it should be immediately bought to the notice of the chief editor and managing editor.
• Any useful information found in the review process, should not be used for personal advantage.
• The review process should not take more than 6 weeks. Reviewer should abstain himself from reviewing paper which have conflicts of interest arising from relationship with authors, collaborative connections, institutions connected to the paper.